601. Beneath the Denmark-Russia BIT, as there's no limiting language, it is sort of obvious that its arbitration clause in Post 8 supplies jurisdiction regarding the defense granted in Short article four of that BIT for expropriation. Thus, by using the MFN clause in Article 3 IPPA, the current Trib

Claimant also now expressly disclaims which the assessment of Yukos’ taxes, which featured so prominently in its prior submissions, constituted acts of expropriation. Contrary to the representation produced by Claimant in its Statement of Declare that it experienced "consistently held